Psychiatric Services
Journal Home Search Current Issue Past Issues Subscribe All APPI Journals Help Contact Us
 
Psychiatr Serv 60:677-681, May 2009
doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.60.5.677
© 2009 American Psychiatric Association
Quicksearch
Advanced Search
Or Search All APPI Journals
This Article
* Full Text
* Full Text (PDF)
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
* Email this article to a Colleague
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Articles & Searches
* Download to citation manager
* reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by Borntrager, C. F.
* Articles by Weisz, J. R.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by Borntrager, C. F.
* Articles by Weisz, J. R.
Related Collections
* Quality of Care, Practice Guidelines
* Other Education and Training Issues
* Psychotherapies (General)
*Related Article

Article

Provider Attitudes Toward Evidence-Based Practices: Are the Concerns With the Evidence or With the Manuals?

Cameo F. Borntrager, Ph.D., Bruce F. Chorpita, Ph.D., Charmaine Higa-McMillan, Ph.D. and John R. Weisz, Ph.D.

Dr. Borntrager, Dr. Chorpita, and Dr. Higa-McMillan are affiliated with the Department of Psychology, University of Hawaii at Manoa, 2430 Campus Rd., Gartley 110, Honolulu, HI 96822 (e-mail: cameob{at}hawaii.edu). Dr. Weisz is with the Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

OBJECTIVE: Studies examining therapists' attitudes toward evidence-based practices, which have at times become conflated with "manualized treatments," have indicated a number of concerns regarding perceived inflexibility, a lack of attention to the therapeutic alliance between provider and client, and a lack of emphasis on clinical judgment. This investigation examined the effect of training in two different formats of evidence-based treatments (standard treatment manuals versus modular assembly of treatment procedures) and with the use of two measures of attitudes. METHODS: As part of a randomized clinical effectiveness trial, the attitudes of 59 therapists were assessed before and after training for a standard evidence-based treatment protocol and for a modular evidence-based treatment protocol. Attitudes were also assessed across two attitude measures that differentially emphasize the use of treatment manuals. RESULTS: Results showed that compared with the standard condition, in the modular condition therapists' attitudes became significantly more favorable toward evidence-based practices but only on the attitude measure that did not refer specifically to the use of manuals. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this investigation have implications for dissemination of evidence-based practices and policy change. Contextual adaptations in evidence-based practice design and training may result in wider adoption of innovative and efficacious treatment practices.


Related Article:

May 2009: This Month's Highlights
Psychiatr Serv 2009 60: 579. [Full Text] [PDF]






Get information about faster international access.

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2009 American Psychiatric Association. All rights reserved.

Home | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscribe | All APPI Journals | Help | Contact Us

American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc. American Psychiatric Association
1000 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1825, Arlington, VA 22209-3901 * 800-368-5777 * appi at psych.org