Full Text Full Text (PDF) CONSORT chart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Email this article to a Colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My Articles & Searches Download to citation manager Citing Articles via Google Scholar Articles by Raue, P. J. Articles by Bruce, M. L. Search for Related Content PubMed Citation Articles by Raue, P. J. Articles by Bruce, M. L. Patient Satisfaction, Quality of Life Treatment Compliance Depression Related Article

Patients' Depression Treatment Preferences and Initiation, Adherence, and Outcome: A Randomized Primary Care Study

With the exception of Dr. Heo, the authors are affiliated with the Department of Psychiatry, Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell University, 21 Bloomingdale Rd., 2 South, White Plains, NY 10605 (e-mail: praue{at}med.cornell.edu). Dr. Heo is with the Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York.

OBJECTIVE: The authors examined the association of treatment preferences with treatment initiation, adherence, and clinical outcome among nonsenior adult and senior primary care patients with depression. METHODS: Sixty primary care participants meeting DSM-IV criteria for major depression were randomly assigned to receive treatment congruent or incongruent with their primary stated preference. Participants received either 20 weeks of escitalopram, with monitoring by a care manager, or 12 weekly sessions of interpersonal psychotherapy followed by two monthly booster sessions. Adherence to treatment and depression severity were reassessed at weeks 4, 8, 12, and 24. RESULTS: Participants expressed stronger preferences for psychotherapy than for antidepressant medication. Preference strength was a more sensitive measure of outcome than was congruence versus incongruence of preference with the assigned treatment. Across age groups, preference strength was significantly associated with treatment initiation and 12-week adherence rate but not with depression severity or remission. CONCLUSIONS: A continuous measure of preference strength may be a more useful measure in clinical practice than preferences per se. Future research should focus on whether and how greater facilitation of the treatment decision-making process between patient and clinician influences clinical outcome.

Related Article:

March 2009: This Month's Highlights
Psychiatr Serv 2009 60: 285. [Full Text] [PDF]

Get information about faster international access.

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2009 American Psychiatric Association. All rights reserved.

Home | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscribe | All APPI Journals | Help | Contact Us