Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Email this article to a Colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My Articles & Searches Download to citation manager Citing Articles via Google Scholar Articles by Cuddeback, G. S. Articles by Cusack, K. J. Search for Related Content PubMed Citation Articles by Cuddeback, G. S. Articles by Cusack, K. J. Mentally Ill Offenders Needs Assessment Other Health Services Issues Related Articles

How Many Forensic Assertive Community Treatment Teams Do We Need?

Despite the growing interest in forensic assertive community treatment (FACT), there is no standardized definition of FACT eligibility and no guidelines for how many FACT teams communities may need. In this brief report a definition for FACT eligibility is proposed—severe and persistent mental illness and three jail detentions in a one-year period—and modeled by using 5.5 years of administrative data (July 1, 1993, through December 31, 1998) from a large, urban county in the western United States. Findings suggest that large, urban communities should develop enough FACT teams to serve approximately 44% of their populations of persons with severe mental illness, or roughly .05% of their adult populations. Developing standardized eligibility criteria for FACT is an important first step toward developing its evidence base.

Related Articles:

Jail Incarceration, Homelessness, and Mental Health: A National Study

Greg A. Greenberg and Robert A. Rosenheck
Psychiatr Serv 2008 59: 170-177. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Get information about faster international access.

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2008 American Psychiatric Association. All rights reserved.

Home | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscribe | All APPI Journals | Help | Contact Us