Between one- and two-thirds of adults with severe mental illness reside with their families, most with aging parents (1,2,3). As parents age, they face the reality that declining abilities and health problems will eventually limit their capacity to provide care (4). Thus it is not surprising that older parents repeatedly express great apprehension over what will happen to their offspring with severe mental illness when the parents become frail or pass away (1,3,5,6,7,8).
Aging parents must plan adequately for the future care of their offspring with lifelong disabilities. Without definite plans, offspring who outlive their parents may experience inappropriate emergency placements in an unprepared service system (9,10,11). However, if plans exist, relocation trauma can be averted by preparing offspring for the intended transition and by fostering independence (3,9,10). Moreover, until parents who are elderly make future plans, a sense of unfinished business may prevent acceptance of their impending death with equanimity (12).
Although the ability of aging parents to plan for the future has serious implications for families and the service system, only a handful of investigators have examined these issues (8,9,10,13). A consistent finding across these studies was that only 10 to 20 percent of older caregivers had made definite plans about future residential arrangements for their offspring with a disability. Yet one study also found that most parents (66 percent, or 104 parents) had established financial plans for their offspring with a disability (13). Thus, despite parents' awareness of the general need for planning, residential planning is an especially difficult problem for parents to resolve.
Research about factors that facilitate or impede residential planning among older parents with offspring with a disability has been scarce. Two studies involving older Israeli parents reported that caregivers who were overwhelmed with daily hassles were unable to take the necessary steps toward placement (14,15). Hatfield and Lefly (9) sampled 210 older caregivers from selected regions in the United States and found major obstacles to planning: personal problems of caregivers (anxiety about the future, insufficient knowledge, and limited finances), characteristics of the care recipient (resistance to change, refusal of help, and emotional instability), and characteristics of the service system (limited housing options and uncoordinated services). In Smith and colleagues' (13) national study of 157 older mothers, a majority of participants mentioned awareness of age-related changes in themselves or their spouses as the primary reason for planning, indicated the need for help with planning, and wished that their offspring without a disability would assume future care.
Although these past studies provide insight into variables that might affect which stage of residential planning older parents are in, the findings of these studies are inconclusive. One shortcoming is that these studies examined mainly caregivers who were not representative of the U.S. population. Two studies involved samples of older Israeli parents (14,15), and the third sampled older American parents and other relatives from only a few states (9). These studies were also largely atheoretical and did not build on past research with similar caregiver populations. Finally, because the investigators relied primarily on univariate statistics, they did not consider how multiple variables act together to affect planning.
The study reported here examined predictors of future residential planning among a national sample of older mothers who care at home for their offspring with severe mental illness. The predictors were examined within the multivariate framework of the Double ABCX model of family stress and coping (16). Consensus exists that family outcomes are best understood from a stress and coping paradigm (17,18), and the Double ABCX model has been used in past research to identify predictors of residential planning among older parents of adults with mental retardation (19,20).
In the Double ABCX model, A refers to objective stressors of caregiving; B indicates mediators, specifically resources and coping behaviors that are used in response to stressors; C conveys family members' appraisals of the situation; and X denotes a relevant family outcome (16). Hypothesized causality leads from objective stressors (A) to appraisals (C), with the impact of the stressors and appraisals on the outcome (X) being mediated by resources and coping skills (B). Double refers to the accumulation of problems that are secondary to caregiving, such as changes in caregivers' functional ability, that effect adaptation.
In this study, the stage of residential planning that was reported by older mothers was the outcome. Following the Double ABCX framework, independent variables were classified as objective stressors, appraisals, or mediators (resources and coping behaviors). The study's hypothesis was that mediators and appraisals would have more of a proximal effect on residential planning than objective stressors. Several positive aspects of family caregiving were also included, given recent claims about the explanatory importance of resilience among families of adults with lifelong disabilities (21). Background characteristics that might influence residential planning were considered as well. t1 summarizes the proposed model and states the hypothesized relationship between each predictor variable and stage of residential planning (4,9,10,15,18,19,20,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29).
The sample used in this study was identical to that from an earlier descriptive study of permanency planning by Smith and colleagues (13). Mothers aged 50 years and older who lived with a mentally ill offspring were recruited between 1995 and 1997 through announcements in newsletters from the National Alliance for the Mentally Ill. Participation was restricted to mothers because they tend to be the primary caregiver (6).
The recruitment yielded 196 mothers from 41 states, 157 of whom met the criteria of living with their offspring. Participants' mean±SD age was 67±7.7 years. A total of 144 participants (92 percent) were non-Hispanic white, 96 (61 percent) were married, 154 (98 percent) had at least a high school education, and 124 (79 percent) reported their health as good or excellent. Offspring were considered to have diagnoses of severe mental illness if they were reported by their mothers to have diagnoses of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder (94 offspring, or 60 percent), multiple disorders (31 offspring, or 20 percent), bipolar disorder (25 offspring, or 16 percent), or other severe psychiatric illnesses (7 offspring, or 5 percent). A total of 120 offspring were men (76 percent), and their age ranged from 20 to 58 years (mean, 38±8.2 years). Most offspring (114, or 73 percent) were rated by their mothers to be in good or excellent physical health. A third of offspring (N=52) engaged in activities outside the home (for example, day programs), whereas half (N=78) spent their typical day at home. Seventy-three mothers (47 percent) reported that their offspring relied on them for help with everyday chores, and 64 mothers (41 percent) reported that their offspring relied on them for help with chores plus daily structure.
This sample was similar to that found in previous studies involving the National Alliance for the Mentally Ill, in which the typical family pattern has been an aging parent, usually a mother in her late 50s to 70s, who cares for a son approaching middle age (30).
Mothers who indicated by phone or mail that they were willing to participate in the study were mailed a questionnaire about their family caregiving circumstances and a letter of informed consent (N=171). The questionnaire was adapted from an instrument used in a previous study that surveyed older mothers of adults with mental retardation (20). Ninety-two percent (N=157) of the surveys were completed by eligible respondents and returned in a self-addressed stamped envelope. The study was approved by the institutional review board at the University of Maryland, College Park.
Stage of residential planning was assessed by asking respondents to indicate which of five ascending stages best described their current state of planning for the future residence of their offspring: "No discussions have occurred yet"; "Some discussions have occurred, but they were not serious"; "There has been serious consideration of residential alternatives"; "Some plans have been made, but they are not definite"; and "Definite plans are made." This measure originated in previous research about older mothers of adults with mental retardation (20) and coincided with the view that residential planning is a protracted process (31). The instruments that were used to assess the predictor variables are summarized in t1.
A hierarchical regression analysis was performed by using SPSS 10.0 for Windows to examine individual predictors of residential planning stage. Predictors were organized into blocks on the basis of the Double ABCX model (16). This procedure yielded five equations in which each block was entered according to the prioritized logic of the model. This procedure also permitted simultaneous control of each independent factor in the model.
Only 17 mothers (11 percent) reported that definite residential plans had been made for their offspring, whereas 28 (18 percent) reported having plans that were not definite. Thirty mothers (19 percent) reported serious consideration or discussion of alternatives, 58 (37 percent) reported discussions that were not serious, and 24 (15 percent) had given this matter no attention.
Zero-order correlations, means, standard deviations, and the observed range for all model variables are presented in t2. Higher stages of residential planning were associated at statistically significant levels with the mother's age, less use of avoidance as a means of coping, discussion of residential plans with the offspring with a disability, the desire to have family members assume future care responsibilities, and lower subjective burden of providing care. None of the objective stressors or family resources were significantly related to stage of planning at the bivariate level.
The results of the hierachical regression analysis based on the Double ABCX model are shown in t3. The SPSS collinearity diagnostic statistics (that is, tolerance, variation inflation index, and condition index) revealed no multicollinearity problems among the model's independent variables. Inspection of P-P (probability-probability) and residual plots revealed that multiple regression assumptions about normality (kurtosis=−.876), linearity, and homoscedasticity were met.
As hypothesized, variables that were categorized as appraisals and coping behaviors were the strongest predictors of the stage of residential planning. Higher stages of planning were associated with less avoidance coping, discussion of plans with the offspring with a disability, the desire to have family members assume future care responsibilities, lower subjective burden, and greater self-perception of adverse age-related change. The model accounted for 20 percent of the variance in residential planning, and more than half of this variance was associated with coping behaviors and appraisals.
Contrary to the study hypotheses, neither the objective stressors of caregiving nor the resources available to the family were significantly related to the stage of residential planning. However, consistent with the Double ABCX model, the bivariate correlations suggest that some variables in these categories may exert indirect effects on planning. For example, the two appraisals that emerged as the strongest predictors of planning stage in the regression analysis—the mothers' greater subjective burden and self-perception of adverse age-related change—were found at the bivariate level to be associated with more behavioral problems and less family cohesion. It is also noteworthy that the mothers' age remained a significant predictor of planning stage throughout the regression analysis until the mothers' appraisals of self and the caregiving situation were entered into the final equation. These findings suggest that greater subjective burden and the perception of becoming older, rather than chronological age itself, instigate residential planning.
Consistent with past research about this population, only a small percentage of older mothers in the study reported here had made definite plans for future living arrangements of their offspring (8,9,10,13). Moreover, use of avoidance coping was inversely related to stage of planning at both the univariate and the multivariate levels of analysis. These findings reinforce previous assertions that future planning is an arduous and tormenting process to undertake for older parents of adults with lifelong disabilities of any type (3,4,20). Therefore, it is not surprising that several additional findings of the study reported here bear a striking similarity to those previously observed among older mothers of adults with mental retardation.
As in previous research on parents of adults with mental retardation (20), the objective demands of caregiving had a less immediate effect on residential planning than either coping behaviors or appraisals. Also, as with past research on older mothers of adults with mental retardation, the appraisal of being adversely affected by the aging process was one of the strongest predictors of residential planning stage. Thus it appears that the decision of aging parents to execute residential planning is affected more by parents' self-perceived ability to persist in the caregiver role than by the actual demands of caregiving. If parents' awareness of becoming more disabled provokes realization of the need to plan, then practitioners face the task of assisting those who have not yet planned to engage in self-exploration of their increasing limitations (20).
Subjective burden is another appraisal found to be related to residential planning in both the study reported here and in research about older mothers of adults with mental retardation (20). The tendency for parents who reported a higher burden to engage in less planning may be explained, in part, by past research about family members who care for persons who are frail and elderly (32). This research showed that the competing demands of caregiving induced "tendencies to denyor dismiss the stressfulness of events in order to reduce the amount of informationor arousal requiring immediate attention" (32). Similarly, Rimmerman and Keren (15) asserted that parents of adults with severe mental illness who feel overwhelmed with daily hassles are unable to take necessary steps toward placement, such as getting information about residential settings or exploring the procedures needed for application. Thus older parents who feel intensely burdened by immediate caregiving responsibilities may lack sufficient energy or patience to confront the demanding task of residential planning. Yet, in the absence of longitudinal data, one cannot rule out the opposite direction of causality wherein older mothers of adults with long-term disabilities may feel less burdened after taking steps toward resolving the future of their offspring.
Another similarity between aging mothers of adults with mental illness and aging mothers of adults with mental retardation concerns the use of avoidance in facing the demands of planning. As in the study reported here, increased use of avoidance was found in previous studies to be related to less residential planning among older mothers of adults with mental retardation (20,33). According to Cook (6), one reason that older mothers shun planning is to preserve what little self-esteem their offspring have left by avoiding situations that might lead to failure or further deterioration, such as moving away from the parental home. Joffres (10) similarly reported that older parents do not involve offspring with disabilities in planning because parents fear that such involvement would devastate their offspring. Moreover, research on family caregiving to persons who are elderly suggests that denial of the negative consequences of aging limits discussions of the future as caregiving dyads avoid thinking and talking about what lies ahead (34). Thus practitioners should realize that denial of what the future may hold is an issue that transcends multiple caregiving contexts.
Another key finding of the study is that mothers who involved their offspring in discussions about the future were further along in residential planning than those who did not. This finding coincides with Joffre's (10) observation that the end of co-residence often reflects the desire of the mentally ill offspring or has been initiated by the offspring, a phenomenon not uncommon among offspring with mental retardation. Although Hatfield and Lefly (9) claim that families can be stymied in their planning efforts if their relative with severe mental illness refuses to go along with the plans made, fewer than half of the older mothers in the sample from this study who had involved their offspring in planning discussions also reported parent-offspring agreement about these discussions (13). This finding suggests that parents may need help from mental health professionals with involving the offspring in the planning process and resolving family disagreements about the offspring's future living arrangements.
Greater residential planning was also associated with the desire to have family members as future caregivers, even though only one-quarter of older mothers thought such arrangements would definitely occur (13). This finding reinforces the conclusion of other authors that family discussions, especially those involving siblings of the offspring with a disability, are an important component of the planning process (20,27,28). Thus, in addition to learning about available resources and how to obtain them, many families need help with involving siblings and other family members in future care (9).
Contrary to the study hypotheses, neither the use of formal services nor the availability of informal support from siblings of the offspring with severe mental illness was significantly related to residential planning stage at either the bivariate or the multivariate levels. This finding is remarkably different from past research in which these two variables were found to have direct positive effects on residential planning stage among older mothers of adults with mental retardation (20). One likely explanation for these discrepant findings is that mothers of adults with mental illness typically have smaller social support networks and fewer substitute caregivers to call on because of the higher levels of social stigma and disruptive behaviors that are associated with mental illness (35,36,37).
Evidence also exists that older parents of adults with severe mental illness view their overall interaction with the service system as unsatisfactory and a contributing factor to their overall burden (7,22). On the other hand, Hatfield and Lefly (9) noted that older caregivers had little criticism about professional assistance with planning. Instead, older caregivers attributed obstacles to planning to themselves and to their relative than to the service system. Nevertheless, very few older parents actually turn to mental health professionals for planning assistance (9,13,15).
Several limitations of the study reported here are noteworthy. First, despite a national scope, the sample was self-selected, drawn entirely from National Alliance for the Mentally Ill membership, and lacked ethnic and cultural diversity. Second, without longitudinal data it is impossible to draw firm conclusions about the directionality of the hypothesized relationships between variables. As mentioned above, for some relationships, causality may actually be in the opposite direction than hypothesized here. Third, all data were self-reported by study participants and may not reflect their true planning behaviors. Fourth, by focusing on planning stage, this study overlooked other facets of planning and placement, such as future intentions to place, preferences for placement, requests for placements, urgency of placement, and actual placement (38).
The low amount of variance (20 percent) explained in the multiple regression analysis indicates that the proposed model does not include all meaningful predictors of residential planning. Future research is needed to explore the potential impact of other factors, such as the specific roles of offspring with severe mental illness and other family members in the planning process, as well as characteristics of the service system that either facilitate or impede residential planning by aging families.
Despite the limitations of this study, it sheds important new light on a virtually unexplored topic of great relevance to adults with severe mental illness, their families, and the service system intended to meet their needs. Most notably, the findings suggest that in addition to providing relevant information and alleviating the subjective burden that undermines residential planning, service providers can best assist older parents by encouraging them to acknowledge age-related changes that signal the need to plan and by helping them to involve the entire family in the planning process.
This study was funded by the Graduate Research Board at the University of Maryland, College Park.
Dr. Smith is affiliated with the School of Family and Consumer Studies at Kent State University, 144 Nixson Hall, Kent, Ohio 44242 (e-mail, email@example.com).
Summary of proposed model and measures used to predict the residential planning stage among 157 aging mothers of adults with mental illness
Bivariate correlations, means, standard deviations, and observed ranges for model variables among 157 aging mothers of adults with mental illnessa
a Means and standard deviations not shown for dichotomous variables
Results of regression analysis of residential planning stage on predictors among 157 aging mothers of adults with mental illnessa
a Mean substitution used for missing data (N=7)