The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1176/ps.50.1.51

Managed care in the public sector remains a poorly defined concept. It is currently understood largely through case examples, an approach of limited usefulness because each managed care initiative is shaped by local forces and is constantly changing. The authors describe ten key dimensions on which such initiatives vary and suggest that they can be used to examine essential characteristics of the initiatives and core differences between them. The dimensions are objectives, scope, organizational structures and authority, enrollment, benefit package, strategies for managing utilization, best practices, financing, quality management and outcomes measurement, and the impact of the initiative on the public mental health system. Using these dimensions to assess existing initiatives, the authors conclude that most focus on one principal dimension to the exclusion of other critical dimensions. The authors argue for a comprehensive approach to planning and implementing managed care projects that should ultimately lead to better care for public-sector populations.