The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1176/ps.49.10.1309

Because psychiatrists cannot include everything they observe and everything the patient says in the medical chart, they must select and tailor what goes into the chart. They should tailor the chart to focus on what is significant for the diagnosis and treatment of the patient. However, sometimes they tailor the chart for other purposes: to ensure that managed care will cover continued hospitalization, to protect themselves against malpractice claims, to secure a civil commitment, or to obtain a long-term placement for the patient. The authors of this paper present and analyze four cases in which psychiatrists tailor charts for these purposes. They discuss whether each psychiatrist's actions are ethically justified and consider whether tailoring the chart is a deceptive practice. In each case, they present reasons for and against this practice and suggest truthful alternatives designed to improve patient care, preserve social trust in the profession of psychiatry, and challenge serious failings in the health care system.