OBJECTIVE: The relative effectiveness of two types of group therapy-the
disease-and-recovery model and the cognitive-behavioral model-was examined
in a public inpatient and outpatient setting with consumers who had a dual
diagnosis of a personality disorder and a substance use disorder. Outcomes
in four areas of problem severity were measured: alcohol use, drug use,
social and family relations, and psychological functioning. METHODS: Using
a quasiexperimental group design, 19 subjects in an inpatient mental health
facility and 19 in a public outpatient facility were randomly assigned to
the two experimental groups. The groups met three times a week for 12
weeks, and specific group leadership protocols were used. A third group at
each setting received usual group treatment. Diagnoses of all subjects were
verified using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R. The
Addiction Severity Index measured changes in problem severity. RESULTS: In
the inpatient setting, subjects in both experimental groups had
significantly improved social and family relations compared with the
usual-treatment group; no posttest changes in the other three areas were
noted. In the outpatient setting, cognitive-behavioral group therapy was
significantly more effective than the other two group approaches in
reducing alcohol use, improving social and family relations, and enhancing
psychological functioning. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that the severity
of mental health consumers' substance abuse problems can be substantially
decreased in several areas in an outpatient public setting. In an inpatient
setting, the use of either group therapy model was more effective in
reducing problem severity than using no specific model.
Abstract Teaser