The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1176/ps.43.6.644

Previous studies of detection of alcoholism by primary medical care-givers have found discovery rates to be at best 50 percent (2-6). In this study, mental health clinicians-in-training recognized alcohol-related symptoms in almost 70 percent of patients. However, alcohol abuse was unrecognized in nearly a third of patients identified as probable alcohol abusers.

Significant differences between therapists' ratings of the success of treatment of alcohol abusers and the success of treatment of nonabusers were found. Patients in whom alcohol abuse was recognized tended to be rated as more enjoyable to work with and as having a more successful treatment than patients whose alcohol problems were unrecognized, although this difference was not significant. This trend is consistent with clinical impressions that clinicians' failure to recognize patients' alcohol-related symptoms may produce miscommunication that can result in the clinicians' experiencing a sense of frustration and futility and the patients' experiencing a sense of being less well understood.

The short form of the MAST, although less sensitive than the trainees' judgments, was quite accurate in predicting which patients were alcohol abusers. Our experience indicates that brief screening scales like the MAST could be valuable and easily administered adjuncts to the evaluation of general psychiatric outpatient populations. Routine use of such scales might reduce the frequency of nonrecognition of a variety of substance abuse problems as well as raise the consciousness of providers working in settings that do not offer specialized substance abuse treatment services.

Access content

To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.