0
Get Alert
Please Wait... Processing your request... Please Wait.
You must sign in to sign-up for alerts.

Please confirm that your email address is correct, so you can successfully receive this alert.

Article   |    
Urban Psychiatric Commitments: Disability and Dangerous Behavior of Black and White Recent Admissions
Kenneth P. Lindsey; Gordon L Paul; Marco J. Mariotto
Psychiatric Services 1989; doi:
View Author and Article Information

This study was the basis of a master's thesis under the direction of Dr. Paul. The authors thank Edwin P. Willems, Ph.D., for his helpful comments. This study was partially supported by grants to Dr. Paul from the National Institute of Mental Health (MH-25464), the Illinois Department of Mental Health and Developmental Disabilities, the Joyce Foundation, the MacArthur Foundanon, the Cullen Foundation, and the Center for Public Policy of the University of Houston.

Department of Psychology at the University of Houston

Department of Psychology, University of Houston, Houston, Texas 77004

1989 by the American Psychiatric Association

text A A A
PDF of the full text article.
Abstract

Nationally black patients are overrepresented in public psychiatric institutions and are more likely than white patients to be committed involuntarily. This study of patients from 12 treatment units in the Chicago area, where these patterns were also true, compared the functioning of 227 acute admissions grouped by race (white or black) and admission status (voluntary or involuntary). Patients were assessed by highly trained independent observers using objective measures of dangerous behavior and disability levels, the relevant classes of functioning based on common principies underlying commitment statutes. No evidence was found that racial bias and discrimination in commitment and retention decisions would account for the overrepresentation of blacks among involuntary commitments to public institutions. Rather, the same factors that account for the overrepresentation of blacks compared with whites among all admissions may also explain their overrepresentation among the involuntarily confined. Changes in treatment programming and assessment practices are suggested.

Abstract Teaser
Figures in this Article

Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.
Sign In Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.
Sign In to Access Full Content
 
Username
Password
Sign in via Athens (What is this?)
Athens is a service for single sign-on which enables access to all of an institution's subscriptions on- or off-site.
Not a subscriber?

Subscribe Now/Learn More

PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-5 library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources. This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development.

Need more help? PsychiatryOnline Customer Service may be reached by emailing PsychiatryOnline@psych.org or by calling 800-368-5777 (in the U.S.) or 703-907-7322 (outside the U.S.).

+

References

+
+

CME Activity

There is currently no quiz available for this resource. Please click here to go to the CME page to find another.
Submit a Comments
Please read the other comments before you post yours. Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest.
Comments are moderated and will appear on the site at the discertion of APA editorial staff.

* = Required Field
(if multiple authors, separate names by comma)
Example: John Doe



Related Content
Articles
Books
The American Psychiatric Publishing Textbook of Psychiatry, 5th Edition > Chapter 44.  >
Gabbard's Treatments of Psychiatric Disorders, 4th Edition > Chapter 7.  >
Gabbard's Treatments of Psychiatric Disorders, 4th Edition > Chapter 7.  >
The American Psychiatric Publishing Textbook of Geriatric Psychiatry, 4th Edition > Chapter 32.  >
Dulcan's Textbook of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry > Chapter 11.  >
Topic Collections
Psychiatric News
Read more at Psychiatric News >>