The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1176/ps.39.3.304

To assess the prevalence of and risk factors for depression in an older population, the Multilevel Assessment Instrument (MAI) and the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) were administered to 176 elderly residents of a public housing apartment building in Indianapolis. The 41 patients diagnosed by the CES-D as depressed had significantly lower scores on MAI measures of psychological adjustment, cognitive function, and physical health compared with the nondepressed respondents and were more likely to have had episodes of anxiety and depression in the year before the study. Four variables—respondents' overall physical health as measured by the MAI, days spent sick in bed during the past year, livmg alone, and educational level—explained some of the variance between the CES-D scores of the depressed and nondepressed patients. A model for predicting current levels of depressive symptomatology based on scores on each of these four variables distinguished the depressed from the nondepressed tenants more than 80 percent of the time.

Access content

To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.