The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1176/ps.37.4.339

Dr. Eth's Introduction: The psychiatric emergency room commonly generates ethical conflicts. Perhaps the best known issue centers on civil commitment. Recent interest has also focused on confidentiality and the duty to protect third parties (the so-called Tarasoff warning). However conspicuous, these two ethical problems constitute only a fraction of the dilemmas facing the admitting room psychiatrist. This month's column explores the ethical issues surrounding patient admissions. Although the decision to admit may seem at first glance to be strictly clinical, an array of competing values establishes an ethical dimension.

Access content

To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.