The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1176/ps.36.3.239

Itroduction by Dr. Shrfstein: This month's case is most timely. The ahility of seriously and chronically ill psychiatric patients to fit within a health maintenance organization (HMO) model of organizing and paying for care is a pressing problem. This case describes one effort to handle a difficult patient within these constraints. It highlights basic economic issues, particularly the viability of a plan that is willing to care for seriously ill patients (adverse selection), and basic ethical issues, as illustrated by the decision not to provide intensive psychotherapy, which some practitioners would consider medically necessary. As in other areas of medicine, a treatment plan was formulated based on both clinical and financial grounds. The new medicaleconomic realities of the last part of this century mean that the needs of most seriously mentally ill patients must be met with limited financial resources.

Access content

To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.