The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1176/ps.31.7.472

Because of a previous misinterpretation of Social Security regulations, deinstitutionalized clients in a mental health clinic's rehabilitation center were faced with a decrease in Supplemental Security Income benefits, which meant that the adult home in which they lived did not receive full room-and-board fees. The home threatened to remove clients from the center. In the process of resolving the dilemma, the mental health clinic and the state hospital established a training program to enable clients to make their own financial decisions; it covered such topics as fees at the home and the center and what clients should expect from those facilities, the effect of sheltered workshop earnings on other benefits, and other options for housing and employment. The group leaders encountered problems in trying to get accurate information about benefits and restrictions and with the sometimes conflicting goals of the group home as a business interest. However, clients' interest in and comprehension of the material was high, and by the end of the course they were manifesting more independent behavior.

Access content

To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.