The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201300288

Objective

This study evaluated the relationship between patient characteristics and augmentation strategies for the treatment of major depressive disorder.

Methods

This retrospective, cross-sectional study used data from a psychiatric electronic medical record database for patients with depression without psychosis or psychotic features who initiated augmentation therapy between January 2001 and June 2011. Medical records were evaluated to identify factors predicting use of specific augmentation agents, and a multivariate logistic regression model was used to assess clinical and demographic predictors of augmentation strategy.

Results

Of 3,209 patients initiating augmentation therapy for depression, 75% received augmentation with an antidepressant combination and 11% received augmentation with second-generation antipsychotics. Baseline clinical severity (Clinical Global Impressions–Severity score) most strongly and consistently predicted augmentation with second-generation antipsychotics.

Conclusions

Treatment of patients in specialty settings with depression was often augmented with an antidepressant combination, whereas those with severe depression had an increased likelihood of augmentation with second-generation antipsychotics.