0
Get Alert
Please Wait... Processing your request... Please Wait.
You must sign in to sign-up for alerts.

Please confirm that your email address is correct, so you can successfully receive this alert.

Articles   |    
Validating a Brief Version of the Mental Health Recovery Measure for Individuals With Schizophrenia
Nikki Panasci Armstrong, Ph.D.; Amy N. Cohen, Ph.D.; Gerhard Hellemann, Ph.D.; Christopher Reist, M.D.; Alexander S. Young, M.D., M.S.H.S.
Psychiatric Services 2014; doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201300215
View Author and Article Information

Dr. Armstrong is with the San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center (VAMC) (e-mail: nikki.armstrong@va.gov). At the time of this study, she was with the VAMC Los Angeles, California, where Dr. Young is affiliated. Dr. Cohen is with the VA Desert Pacific Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center (MIRECC) at the VAMC Los Angeles. Dr. Hellemann is with the Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, Semel Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, where Dr. Cohen and Dr. Young are also affiliated. Dr. Reist is with the VA Desert Pacific MIRECC at the Long Beach VA Healthcare Center, Long Beach, California, and the Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, University of California, Irvine.

Copyright © 2014 by the American Psychiatric Association

Abstract

Objective  This study explored the psychometric properties of the 30-item Mental Health Recovery Measure (MHRM) and a brief, ten-item version of the scale (MHRM-10) in a large, multisite sample of individuals with schizophrenia.

Methods  The sample consisted of 795 veterans with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder diagnoses who were receiving mental health services in one of eight Veterans Health Administration medical centers across four regions of the United States. Exploratory factor analysis was used to examine the factor structure of the MHRM and to select the most appropriate ten items for the brief measure. Correlations of the MHRM and the MHRM-10 with measures of quality of life, satisfaction with mental health services, symptom severity, and functioning were computed to further establish construct validity. Cronbach’s alpha was used to assess the internal reliability of the MHRM and MHRM-10.

Results  Factor analysis resulted in an interpretable single-factor solution. The MHRM-10 was established by selecting the ten items with the highest factor loading scores. MHRM and MHRM-10 total scores correlated strongly and positively with quality-of-life measures (overall, leisure, general health, and daily activities) and negatively with depressive mood. Negligible correlations existed between the MHRM instruments and measures of functioning and satisfaction with services. Both instruments demonstrated excellent internal consistency.

Conclusions  This study provides initial support for use of the MHRM-10 as a brief, valid, and reliable assessment of perceived recovery among individuals with schizophrenia and one that may be easily used in routine care.

Abstract Teaser
Figures in this Article

Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.
Sign In Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.
Sign In to Access Full Content
 
Username
Password
Sign in via Athens (What is this?)
Athens is a service for single sign-on which enables access to all of an institution's subscriptions on- or off-site.
Not a subscriber?

Subscribe Now/Learn More

PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-5 library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources. This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development.

Need more help? PsychiatryOnline Customer Service may be reached by emailing PsychiatryOnline@psych.org or by calling 800-368-5777 (in the U.S.) or 703-907-7322 (outside the U.S.).

Anchor for Jump
Table 1Baseline characteristics of 795 veterans with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder
Anchor for Jump
Table 2Exploratory factor analysis of the Mental Health Recovery Measure
Anchor for Jump
Table 3Characteristics of the Mental Health Recovery Measure (MHRM) and the MHRM-10
Table Footer Note

a Possible MHRM-10 scores range from 0 to 40 and possible MHRM scores range from 0 to 120, with higher scores indicating higher perceived mental health recovery.

Table Footer Note

b Reliability estimates for the spirituality, self-empowerment, basic functioning, overcoming stuckness, and advocacy/enrichment domains could not be calculated for the MHRM-10 because of reduction or deletion of items in those domains.

Anchor for Jump
Table 4Mental Health Recovery Measure (MHRM) and MHRM-10 correlations (Pearson r) with other recovery-relevant measures
Table Footer Note

a Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Centers Global Assessment of Functioning

Table Footer Note

*p<.05, **p<.01, two-tailed

+

References

News release: SAMHSA announces a working definition of “recovery” from mental disorders and substance use disorders. Rockville, Md, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Dec 22, 2011. Available at www.samhsa.gov/newsroom/advisories/1112223420.aspx
 
Mental Health: A Report of the Surgeon General. Washington, DC, US Department of Health and Human Services, US Public Health Service, 1999
 
 Achieving the Promise: Transforming Mental Health Care in America. Pub no SMA-03-3832 .  Rockville, Md,  US Department of Health and Human Services, President’s New Freedom Commission on Mental Health, 2003
 
VHA Uniform Mental Health Services in VA Medical Centers and Clinics. VHA Handbook 1160.01. Washington, DC, US Department of Veterans Affairs, Sept 11, 2008. Available at www.mirecc.va.gov/VISN16/docs/UMHS_Handbook_1160.pdf
 
Slade  M;  Hayward  M:  Recovery, psychosis and psychiatry: research is better than rhetoric.  Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 116:81–83, 2007
[CrossRef] | [PubMed]
 
Silverstein  SM;  Bellack  AS:  A scientific agenda for the concept of recovery as it applies to schizophrenia.  Clinical Psychology Review 28:1108–1124, 2008
[CrossRef] | [PubMed]
 
Drapalski  AL;  Medoff  D;  Unick  GJ  et al:  Assessing recovery of people with serious mental illness: development of a new scale.  Psychiatric Services 63:48–53, 2012
[CrossRef] | [PubMed]
 
Young SL, Bullock WA: The Mental Health Recovery Measure. No 918. Toledo, Ohio, University of Toledo, Department of Psychology, 2003
 
Young  SL;  Ensing  DS:  Exploring recovery from the perspective of people with psychiatric disabilities.  Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal 22:219–231, 1999
[CrossRef]
 
Bullock  WA:  Measuring the Promise of Recovery: A Compendium of Recovery Measures . Vol 2. Edited by Campbell-Orde  T;  Chamberlin  J;  Carpenter  J  et al.  Cambridge, Mass,  Evaluation Center at HSRI, 2005
 
Bullock WA: The Mental Health Recovery Measure (MHRM): Updated Normative Data and Psychometric Properties. Toledo, Ohio, University of Toledo, Department of Psychology, Dec 2009
 
Bullock  WA;  Sage  J;  Hupp  D  et al:  From illness to wellness: an evaluation of Ohio’s Wellness Management and Recovery (WMR) program in community mental health and consumer-operated service agencies.  New Research in Mental Health 18:312–321, 2009
 
Brown  AH;  Cohen  AN;  Chinman  MJ  et al:  EQUIP: implementing chronic care principles and applying formative evaluation methods to improve care for schizophrenia: QUERI Series.  Implementation Science 3:9, 2008
[CrossRef] | [PubMed]
 
Hamilton  AB;  Cohen  AN;  Young  AS:  Organizational readiness in specialty mental health care.  Journal of General Internal Medicine 25(suppl 1):27–31, 2010
[CrossRef] | [PubMed]
 
Cohen  AN;  Chinman  MJ;  Hamilton  AB  et al:  Using patient-facing kiosks to support quality improvement at mental health clinics.  Medical Care 51(suppl 1):S13–S20, 2013
[CrossRef] | [PubMed]
 
First MB, Spitzer RL, Gibbon M, et al: Structured Clinical Interview for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Patient Edition, Version 2.0. New York, New York State Psychiatric Institute, 1995
 
Overall  JE;  Gorham  DR:  The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale.  Psychological Reports 10:799–812, 1962
[CrossRef]
 
Ventura  J;  Lukoff  D;  Nuechterlein  KH  et al:  Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) expanded version (4.0): scales, anchor points and administration manual.  International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research 3:227–243, 1993
 
Mueser  KT;  Curran  PJ;  McHugo  GJ:  Factor structure of the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale in schizophrenia.  Psychological Assessment 9:196–204, 1997
[CrossRef]
 
Niv  N;  Cohen  AN;  Sullivan  G  et al:  The MIRECC version of the Global Assessment of Functioning scale: reliability and validity.  Psychiatric Services 58:529–535, 2007
[CrossRef] | [PubMed]
 
Lehman  AF:  The Quality of Life Interview for the chronically mentally ill.  Evaluation and Program Planning 11:51–62, 1988
[CrossRef]
 
Lehman AF: Quality of Life Interview: Self-Administered Short Form (TL-30S Version). Baltimore, Center for Mental Health Services Research, Department of Psychiatry, University of Maryland, 1996
 
Larsen  DL;  Attkisson  CC;  Hargreaves  WA  et al:  Assessment of client/patient satisfaction: development of a general scale.  Evaluation and Program Planning 2:197–207, 1979
[CrossRef] | [PubMed]
 
Attkisson  CC;  Zwick  R:  The Client Satisfaction Questionnaire: psychometric properties and correlations with service utilization and psychotherapy outcome.  Evaluation and Program Planning 5:233–237, 1982
[CrossRef] | [PubMed]
 
 IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows Version 20.0 .  Armonk, NY,  IBM Corp, 2011
 
Roe  D;  Mashiach-Eizenberg  M;  Lysaker  PH:  The relation between objective and subjective domains of recovery among persons with schizophrenia-related disorders.  Schizophrenia Research 131:133–138, 2011
[CrossRef] | [PubMed]
 
Shrank  B;  Slade  M:  Recovery in psychiatry.  Psychiatric Bulletin of the Royal College of Psychiatrists 31:321–325, 2007
[CrossRef]
 
Perlin  JB;  Kolodner  RM;  Roswell  RH:  The Veterans Health Administration: quality, value, accountability, and information as transforming strategies for patient-centered care.  American Journal of Managed Care 10:828–836, 2004
[PubMed]
 
References Container
+
+

CME Activity

There is currently no quiz available for this resource. Please click here to go to the CME page to find another.
Submit a Comments
Please read the other comments before you post yours. Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest.
Comments are moderated and will appear on the site at the discertion of APA editorial staff.

* = Required Field
(if multiple authors, separate names by comma)
Example: John Doe



Related Content
Articles
Books
Manual of Clinical Psychopharmacology, 7th Edition > Chapter 1.  >
Manual of Clinical Psychopharmacology, 7th Edition > Chapter 2.  >
Manual of Clinical Psychopharmacology, 7th Edition > Chapter 9.  >
The American Psychiatric Publishing Textbook of Psychiatry, 5th Edition > Chapter 6.  >
The American Psychiatric Publishing Textbook of Psychiatry, 5th Edition > Chapter 10.  >
Topic Collections
Psychiatric News
Read more at Psychiatric News >>
APA Guidelines
PubMed Articles