0
Get Alert
Please Wait... Processing your request... Please Wait.
You must sign in to sign-up for alerts.

Please confirm that your email address is correct, so you can successfully receive this alert.

Articles   |    
Risk of Hospitalization and Use of First- Versus Second-Generation Antipsychotics Among Nursing Home Residents
Rajender R. Aparasu, M.Pharm., Ph.D.; Satabdi Chatterjee, M.S., Ph.D.; Hua Chen, M.D., Ph.D.
Psychiatric Services 2014; doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201300093
View Author and Article Information

Dr. Aparasu is with the Department of Pharmaceutical Health Outcomes and Policy, Texas Medical Center, and Dr. Chatterjee and Dr. Chen are with the College of Pharmacy, both at the University of Houston, Houston, Texas (e-mail: rraparasu@uh.edu).

Copyright © 2014 by the American Psychiatric Association

Abstract

Objective  The study compared the risk of all-cause hospitalization associated with use of first- versus second-generation antipsychotics among elderly nursing home residents who were eligible for both Medicare and Medicaid.

Methods  A retrospective cohort study design was used to compare the risk of all-cause hospitalization among dual-eligible nursing home residents (≥65 years) during the 180 days after a new prescription for a first-generation (N=3,611) or a second-generation (N=46,293) antipsychotic. Propensity scores created from Medicare and Medicaid Analytic eXtract data were used to identify a matched cohort of equal numbers of users of each antipsychotic class (N=3,609). The Cox proportional model and the extended Cox hazard model were used to evaluate the risk of all-cause hospitalization in the matched cohort.

Results  The unadjusted rates of all-cause hospitalization were 21.3% and 30.5% among users of first- and second-generation antipsychotics, respectively. The Cox proportional model revealed a significant difference between the two classes in risk of all-cause hospitalization (hazard ratio [HR]=1.33, p<.001). There was no difference in hospitalization risk among users of first- versus second-generation antipsychotics within the first 20 days of use; however, the odds of hospitalization among users of first-generation antipsychotics increased by 58% after 20 days of use (HR=1.58, p<.001).

Conclusions  The study findings suggest that use of first- versus second-generation antipsychotics lasting more than 20 days is associated with a differential risk of all-cause hospitalization, possibly due to differential safety profiles of the two classes. Consequently, there is a need to monitor the use of antipsychotics by elderly patients, especially after a period of initial use.

Abstract Teaser
Figures in this Article

Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.
Sign In Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.
Sign In to Access Full Content
 
Username
Password
Sign in via Athens (What is this?)
Athens is a service for single sign-on which enables access to all of an institution's subscriptions on- or off-site.
Not a subscriber?

Subscribe Now/Learn More

PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-5 library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources. This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development.

Need more help? PsychiatryOnline Customer Service may be reached by emailing PsychiatryOnline@psych.org or by calling 800-368-5777 (in the U.S.) or 703-907-7322 (outside the U.S.).

Figure 1 Guidelines for selection of participants in a study of all-cause hospitalizations following initiation of first- or second-generation antipsychotics

Figure 2 Distribution of propensity scores before matching among nursing home residents who were prescribed first-generation (N=3,609) or second-generation (N=46,287) antipsychoticsa

a Mean±SD propensity score=.88±.05, median propensity score=.88, for first-generation antipsychotics; mean±SD propensity score=.93±.06, median propensity score=.93, for second-generation antipsychotics. The curved line indicates normal distribution.

Figure 3 Distribution of propensity scores after matching among nursing home residents who were prescribed first-generation (N=3,609) or second-generation (N=3,609) antipsychoticsa

a Mean±SD propensity score=.88±.05, median propensity score=.88, first-generation antipsychotics; mean±SD=.88±.05, median=.88, second-generation antipsychotics. The curved line indicates normal distribution.

Figure 4 Kaplan-Meier survival curves indicating association between risk of all-cause hospitalization and use of first- or second-generation antipsychoticsa

a Log-rank p<.001

Anchor for Jump
Table 1Baseline characteristics of unmatched and matched cohorts of elderly nursing home residents using second-generation or first-generation antipsychoticsa
Table Footer Note

a Baseline characteristics pertain to the six-month period before index use of an antipsychotic. The matched cohort was created by matching the users of first- and second-generation antipsychotics by propensity score.

+

References

Bagnall  AM;  Jones  L;  Ginnelly  L  et al:  A systematic review of atypical antipsychotic drugs in schizophrenia.  Health Technology Assessment 7:1–193, 2003
 
Jeste  DV;  Dolder  CR;  Nayak  GV  et al:  Atypical antipsychotics in elderly patients with dementia or schizophrenia: review of recent literature.  Harvard Review of Psychiatry 13:340–351, 2005
 
Carson  S;  McDonagh  MS;  Peterson  K:  A systematic review of the efficacy and safety of atypical antipsychotics in patients with psychological and behavioral symptoms of dementia.  Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 54:354–361, 2006
 
Alexopoulos  GS;  Streim  J;  Carpenter  D  et al:  Using antipsychotic agents in older patients.  Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 65(suppl 2):5–99, 2004
 
Medicare Atypical Antipsychotic Drug Claims for Elderly Nursing Home Residents. Pub no OEI-07-08-00150. Washington, DC, US Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Inspector General, May 2011. Available at oig.hhs.gov/oei/reports/oei-07-08-00150.pdf
 
Lieberman  JA;  Stroup  TS;  McEvoy  JP  et al:  Effectiveness of antipsychotic drugs in patients with chronic schizophrenia.  New England Journal of Medicine 353:1209–1223, 2005
 
Jones  PB;  Barnes  TRE;  Davies  L  et al:  Randomized controlled trial of the effect on quality of life of second- vs first-generation antipsychotic drugs in schizophrenia: Cost Utility of the Latest Antipsychotic Drugs in Schizophrenia Study (CUtLASS 1).  Archives of General Psychiatry 63:1079–1087, 2006
 
Kirshner  HS:  Controversies in behavioral neurology: the use of atypical antipsychotic drugs to treat neurobehavioral symptoms in dementia.  Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports 8:471–474, 2008
 
Trifirò  G;  Spina  E;  Gambassi  G:  Use of antipsychotics in elderly patients with dementia: do atypical and conventional agents have a similar safety profile? Pharmacological Research 59:1–12, 2009
 
Henderson  DC:  Managing weight gain and metabolic issues in patients treated with atypical antipsychotics.  Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 69:e04, 2008
 
Baker  RA;  Pikalov  A;  Tran  QV  et al:  Atypical antipsychotic drugs and diabetes mellitus in the US Food and Drug Administration adverse event database: a systematic Bayesian signal detection analysis.  Psychopharmacology Bulletin 42:11–31, 2009
 
Ray  WA;  Chung  CP;  Murray  KT  et al:  Atypical antipsychotic drugs and the risk of sudden cardiac death.  New England Journal of Medicine 360:225–235, 2009
 
Public Health Advisory: Deaths With Antipsychotics in Elderly Patients With Behavioral Disturbances. Silver Spring, Md, US Food and Drug Administration, 2013. Available at www.fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafety/PostmarketDrugSafetyInformationforPatientsandProviders/DrugSafetyInformationforHeathcareProfessionals/PublicHealthAdvisories/ucm053171.htm. Accessed Dec 3, 2010
 
Information for Healthcare Professionals: Conventional Antipsychotics. Silver Spring, Md, US Food and Drug Administration, 2013. Available at www.fda.gov/drugs/drugsafety/postmarketdrugsafetyinformationforpatientsandproviders/ucm124830.htm. Accessed Dec 3, 2010
 
Kennedy  J;  Tien  YY;  Cohen  LJ  et al:  The association between class of antipsychotic and rates of hospitalization: results of a retrospective analysis of data from the 2005 Medicare current beneficiary survey.  Clinical Therapeutics 31:2931–2939, 2009
 
Aparasu  RR;  Jano  E;  Johnson  ML  et al:  Hospitalization risk associated with typical and atypical antipsychotic use in community-dwelling elderly patients.  American Journal of Geriatric Pharmacotherapy 6:198–204, 2008
 
Simoni-Wastila  L;  Ryder  PT;  Qian  J  et al:  Association of antipsychotic use with hospital events and mortality among Medicare beneficiaries residing in long-term care facilities.  American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 17:417–427, 2009
 
Al-Zakwani  IS;  Barron  JJ;  Bullano  MF  et al:  Analysis of healthcare utilization patterns and adherence in patients receiving typical and atypical antipsychotic medications.  Current Medical Research Opinion 19:619–626, 2003
 
Bagchi  AD;  Esposito  D;  Verdier  JM:  Prescription drug use and expenditures among dually eligible beneficiaries.  Health Care Financing Review 28:43–56, 2007
 
Health Care Spending and the Medicare Program. Washington, DC, Medicare Payment Advisory Commission, June 2010. Available at www.medpac.gov/documents/Jun10DataBookEntireReport.pdf
 
Dual Eligibles: Medicaid Role in Filling the Gaps. Washington, DC, Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and Uninsured. Available at kaiserfamilyfoundation.files.wordpress.com/2013/01/dual-eligibles-medicaid-s-role-in-filling-medicare-s-gaps.pdf. Accessed Dec 3, 2010
 
Komisar  HL;  Feder  J;  Kasper  JD:  Unmet long-term care needs: an analysis of Medicare-Medicaid dual eligibles.  Inquiry 42:171–182, 2005
 
Medicaid Analytic eXtract (MAX) General Information. Baltimore, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Oct 2013. Available at www.cms.hhs.gov/MedicaidDataSourcesGenInfo/07_MAXGeneralInformation.asp. Accessed Dec 3, 2010
 
Standard Analytical Files. Baltimore, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Dec 2013. Available at www.cms.hhs.gov/IdentifiableDataFiles/02_StandardAnalyticalFiles.asp. Accessed Dec 3, 2010
 
Find a CMS Data File. Minneapolis, Minn, Research Data Assistance Center. Available at www.resdac.umn.edu/Available_CMS_Data.asp. Accessed Dec 3, 2010
 
Ray  WA:  Evaluating medication effects outside of clinical trials: new-user designs.  American Journal of Epidemiology 158:915–920, 2003
 
Aparasu  RR;  Chatterjee  S;  Mehta  S  et al:  Risk of death in dual-eligible nursing home residents using typical or atypical antipsychotic agents.  Medical Care 50:961–969, 2012
 
Schneeweiss  S;  Setoguchi  S;  Brookhart  A  et al:  Risk of death associated with the use of conventional versus atypical antipsychotic drugs among elderly patients.  Canadian Medical Association Journal 176:627–632, 2007
 
Rosenbaum  PR;  Rubin  DB:  The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects.  Biometrika 70:41–55, 1983
 
Brookhart  MA;  Schneeweiss  S;  Rothman  KJ  et al:  Variable selection for propensity score models.  American Journal of Epidemiology 163:1149–1156, 2006
 
Parson LS: Reducing Bias in a Propensity Score Matched-Pair Sample Using Greedy Matching Techniques. Edmonds, Wash, Ovation Research Group, 2001. Available at www2.sas.com/proceedings/sugi26/p214-26.pdf
 
Austin  PC:  Type I error rates, coverage of confidence intervals, and variance estimation in propensity-score matched analyses.  International Journal of Biostatistics, 2009; doi 10.2202/1557-4679.1146
 
Alexander MT, Kufera JA: Butting Heads on Matched Cohort Analysis Using SAS Software. Baltimore, University of Maryland School of Medicine, National Study Center for Trauma and Emergency Medical Systems, 2007. Available at www.nesug.org/proceedings/nesug07/sa/sa01.pdf
 
Vittinghoff  E;  Glidden  DV;  Shiboski  SC  et al:  Regression Methods in Biostatistics: Linear, Logistic, Survival and Repeated Measures Models .  New York,  Springer, 2005
 
Kleinbaum  DG:  Survival Analysis: A Self-Learning Text .  New York,  Springer-Verlag, 1996
 
Kapur  S;  Remington  G:  Dopamine D(2) receptors and their role in atypical antipsychotic action: still necessary and may even be sufficient.  Biological Psychiatry 50:873–883, 2001
 
Stahl  SM:  Describing an atypical antipsychotic: receptor binding and its role in pathophysiology.  Primary Care Companion to the Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 5:9–13, 2003
 
Schneeweiss  S;  Setoguchi  S;  Brookhart  MA  et al:  Assessing residual confounding of the association between antipsychotic medications and risk of death using survey data.  CNS Drugs 23:171–180, 2009
 
Robins  JM;  Mark  SD;  Newey  WK:  Estimating exposure effects by modelling the expectation of exposure conditional on confounders.  Biometrics 48:479–495, 1992
 
References Container
+
+

CME Activity

There is currently no quiz available for this resource. Please click here to go to the CME page to find another.
Submit a Comments
Please read the other comments before you post yours. Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest.
Comments are moderated and will appear on the site at the discertion of APA editorial staff.

* = Required Field
(if multiple authors, separate names by comma)
Example: John Doe



Related Content
Articles
Books
DSM-5™ Clinical Cases > Chapter 12.  >
Manual of Clinical Psychopharmacology, 7th Edition > Chapter 1.  >
Manual of Clinical Psychopharmacology, 7th Edition > Chapter 4.  >
The American Psychiatric Publishing Textbook of Psychiatry, 5th Edition > Chapter 26.  >
The American Psychiatric Publishing Textbook of Psychiatry, 5th Edition > Chapter 26.  >
Topic Collections
Psychiatric News
APA Guidelines