The greatest weakness of this book, in my view, is that in its attempt for completeness, it describes a utopian interview that it would not be possible to conduct within the timeframe the authors describe. It is difficult to imagine covering such diverse topics as nutrition, leisure activities, and educational history in such detail while still having time to complete the psychiatric history, medical history, substance abuse history, and diagnostic assessment in addition to providing feedback to the patient, who is presumably at least moderately distressed. It would have been helpful if each section had begun with one or two screening questions so that the interviewer could learn to zero in on areas of concern or importance. This approach is alluded to in the discussion of making a diagnosis but could have been emphasized much more throughout the book.