Get Alert
Please Wait... Processing your request... Please Wait.
You must sign in to sign-up for alerts.

Please confirm that your email address is correct, so you can successfully receive this alert.

News and Notes   |    
Kaiser Annual Survey Finds Sharp Increases in Medicaid Enrollment and Spending
Psychiatric Services 2009; doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.60.11.1565
text A A A

Driven by the worst recession in decades, Medicaid enrollment in fiscal year 2009 increased at an average rate of 5.4% across states—the highest rate in six years, surpassing the 3.6% increase that was projected at the start of the state fiscal year (July 1, 2008, for most states). As enrollment grew, state Medicaid spending climbed at the steepest rate in five years—7.9%—outstripping the projected growth of 5.8%. The sharp rise in spending occurred as states experienced the largest decline in tax revenue ever recorded. Data for the first quarter of 2009 showed tax revenue down by 11.8% from the same period in 2008.

Medicaid officials' responses to the Kaiser survey indicated that enrollment would continue to accelerate in 2010—at an average of 6.6% above fiscal year 2009 levels. State Medicaid appropriations for fiscal year 2010, which began on July 1, 2009, for most states, indicated that spending would increase 6.3% above 2009 spending. However, officials in three-fourths of the states reported at least a 50-50 chance that the initial 2010 appropriations would be insufficient.

For the ninth consecutive year, the Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured conducted a survey of Medicaid officials in all 50 states and the District of Columbia to track trends in spending, enrollment, and policy initiatives. A written survey was sent to each Medicaid director in June 2009, and telephone interviews with directors and staff in each state were conducted in July and August. The 108-page survey report includes data for fiscal years 2009 and 2010. It also provides an overview of the current status of the Medicaid program and describes recent policy changes at state and federal levels and pressing issues facing the program.

In February 2009 in an effort to boost the economy, Congress enacted and President Obama signed the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA). The overall package included an estimated $87 billion for a temporary increase (October 2008 through December 2010) in the federal share of state Medicaid costs. This was the single most significant source of fiscal relief to states in the ARRA and helped nearly every state Medicaid program soften cuts and preserve eligibility. To be eligible for the enhanced federal match, states could not tighten restrictions on Medicaid eligibility standards, methodologies, or procedures beyond those that were in place on July 1, 2008.

The funds reached states quickly, according to the Kaiser survey, which found that ARRA funds enabled 44 states to close or reduce shortfalls in the state general fund, 38 states to avoid or reduce provider rate cuts, 36 states to close or reduce the Medicaid budget shortfall, 36 states to avoid benefit cuts, 33 states to help pay for increases in Medicaid enrollment, and 29 states to avoid eligibility cuts or restore eligibility to previous levels. Separate from the eligibility changes tied to ARRA, 29 states reported positive changes in 2009 to increase eligibility standards or initiatives to streamline application processes despite worsening fiscal conditions, and 31 states reported such positive changes for 2010.

Even though ARRA funds helped most states avoid or mitigate provider rate cuts, 33 states cut or froze rates in fiscal 2009 to one or more categories of providers, and 39 state Medicaid agencies reported that their 2010 budgets include rate cuts or freezes. More than any other policy area, rate changes in provider payments have served as a barometer of fiscal conditions in the states, according to the Kaiser report. Although rate restrictions generate program savings, they also can jeopardize provider participation and create substantial access barriers for Medicaid beneficiaries.

Medicaid plays a major role in the nation's health care delivery system, accounting for about one-sixth of all health care spending, nearly half of all nursing home care, and critical funding for a range of safety-net providers. The program currently provides health coverage and long-term care services and supports for 60 million low-income Americans, including nearly 30 million low-income children, 15 million adults, and 14 million elderly persons and individuals with disabilities. The program also provides assistance to 8.8 million low-income Medicare beneficiaries ("dual eligibles"). Medicaid represents the largest source of federal revenue to states, providing a substantial enhancement to states' capacity to finance health coverage.

Considerable economic uncertainty remains as states plan for 2011 and beyond. Even though the recession may have officially ended by the time that state legislatures appropriate initial 2011 funds, state budget shortfalls are projected to exceed $350 billion through 2011. Most states will have run out of options to achieve further significant cuts in their Medicaid programs, and the enhanced matching funds provided by ARRA will expire at the end of 2010. Officials in many states reported that they may be pressured to consider previously unthinkable reductions in eligibility and benefits.

State officials also cited health care reform as another looming unknown as they plan for the future. Given Medicaid's role in serving low-income and high-need populations and recent data showing that two-thirds of the 46 million uninsured Americans have incomes below 200% of the poverty level as well as substantial health care needs, Medicaid is a logical platform from which to extend coverage, the Kaiser report notes. In fact, at press time the House Tri-Committee's bill and the Senate Finance Committee's proposal would expand Medicaid to all individuals up to 133% of the federal poverty level.

In their responses to the Kaiser survey, Medicaid directors indicated that although they supported the general principles underpinning federal reform, the proposals being considered would present substantial fiscal and administrative challenges for their agencies. However, many also noted that changes included in the reform proposals would present an opportunity to address goals that state programs have worked toward for many years—better management of high-need populations (including "dual eligibles"), simplification of Medicaid eligibility rules, streamlining of the enrollment process, and closure of gaps in the safety net. The Crunch Continues: Medicaid Spending, Coverage and Policy in the Midst of a Recession is available on the Kaiser Foundation Web site at www.kff.org.

In addition to the survey report, the Kaiser Commission has also issued two briefs that describe federal and state efforts to increase Medicaid beneficiaries' access to long-term care services and supports that are provided at home and in the community, rather than in institutions where they have historically been covered. In 2007 spending on home- and community-based services accounted for 43% of total Medicaid long-term care spending, up from 13% in 1990. The first brief, Advancing Access to Medicaid Home and Community-Based Services: Key Issues Based on a Working Group Discussion With Medicaid Experts, summarizes strategies to address financing, program administration, and community workforce challenges that stakeholders agree must be overcome to expand access to home- and community-based services. A companion brief, Efforts in States to Promote Medicaid Community-Based Services and Supports, summarizes lessons from states at the forefront of this effort. The brief describes current options for state Medicaid programs and draws on interviews with state officials to provide details about specific policies and procedures in their states.




CME Activity

There is currently no quiz available for this resource. Please click here to go to the CME page to find another.
Submit a Comments
Please read the other comments before you post yours. Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest.
Comments are moderated and will appear on the site at the discertion of APA editorial staff.

* = Required Field
(if multiple authors, separate names by comma)
Example: John Doe

Related Content
The American Psychiatric Publishing Textbook of Geriatric Psychiatry, 4th Edition > Chapter 33.  >
The American Psychiatric Publishing Textbook of Geriatric Psychiatry, 4th Edition > Chapter 33.  >
The American Psychiatric Publishing Textbook of Geriatric Psychiatry, 4th Edition > Chapter 33.  >
The American Psychiatric Publishing Textbook of Geriatric Psychiatry, 4th Edition > Chapter 33.  >
Textbook of Traumatic Brain Injury, 2nd Edition > Chapter 33.  >
Topic Collections
Psychiatric News
PubMed Articles