0
Get Alert
Please Wait... Processing your request... Please Wait.
You must sign in to sign-up for alerts.

Please confirm that your email address is correct, so you can successfully receive this alert.

1
Letter   |    
Use of the BASIS-32
Susan V. Eisen, Ph.D.
Psychiatric Services 1998; doi:

To the Editor: The article by Klinkenberg and associates (1) in the September 1998 issue, entitled "Reliability and Validity of the Interview and Self-Report Versions of the BASIS-32," was interesting and informative. However, based on the description of the methods reported, I would like to note that the interview version of the BASIS-32 that the researchers employed does not conform to the interview version employed by my colleagues and me (2).

Our use of the BASIS-32 as a structured interview involves reading the questions to respondents, then showing them a "response card" with the same 0 to 4 rating scale that is used in the self-report version of the instrument. As described by Eisen (2), the interviewer reads the response choices and asks the patient to provide his or her rating for each item. This method maintains the BASIS-32 as an instrument assessing the patient's perspective on his or her symptoms and problems.

The methods described by Klinkenberg and associates appear to involve a clinician's assessment of the patient's symptom and problem difficulty. Thus the authors appear to be using a clinician version of the BASIS-32, rather than an interview version of a self-report measure. The lower levels of reliability found for this interview version are not surprising, as the clinician's judgment introduces another source of variance into the ratings.

Dr. Eisen is assistant director of the department of mental health services research at McLean Hospital and assistant professor in the department of psychiatry at Harvard Medical School in Boston.

Klinkenberg WD, Cho DW, Vieweg B: Reliability and validity of the interview and self-report versions of the BASIS-32. Psychiatric Services 49:1229-1231,  1998
 
Eisen SV: Assessment of subjective distress by patients' self-report versus structured interview. Psychological Reports 76:35-39,  1995
 
+

References

Klinkenberg WD, Cho DW, Vieweg B: Reliability and validity of the interview and self-report versions of the BASIS-32. Psychiatric Services 49:1229-1231,  1998
 
Eisen SV: Assessment of subjective distress by patients' self-report versus structured interview. Psychological Reports 76:35-39,  1995
 
+
+

CME Activity

There is currently no quiz available for this resource. Please click here to go to the CME page to find another.
Submit a Comments
Please read the other comments before you post yours. Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest.
Comments are moderated and will appear on the site at the discertion of APA editorial staff.

* = Required Field
(if multiple authors, separate names by comma)
Example: John Doe



Related Content
Books
Dulcan's Textbook of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry > Chapter 7.  >
The American Psychiatric Publishing Textbook of Geriatric Psychiatry, 4th Edition > Chapter 9.  >
The American Psychiatric Publishing Textbook of Substance Abuse Treatment, 4th Edition > Chapter 5.  >
APA Practice Guidelines > Chapter 0.  >
The American Psychiatric Publishing Textbook of Geriatric Psychiatry, 4th Edition > Chapter 9.  >
Psychiatric News
PubMed Articles