The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1176/ps.49.7.951

OBJECTIVE: The study examined functional impairment associated with psychological distress and severity of medical illness in a rural primary care population and explored how functional impairment varied with psychological distress and chronic medical illness. METHODS: Fifty-eight patients recruited from three rural primary care clinics completed the 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) and the Typology of Psychic Distress (PsyDis). The chronic disease score, a measure of the severity of chronic medical illness, was calculated from data on use of prescription medications over a six-month period. T tests were used to determine the level of functional impairment associated with various levels of psychological distress and medical illness. Regression analyses were used to determine the proportion of variance in impairment that was explained by level of psychological distress and severity of medical illness. RESULTS: High levels of psychological distress explained the variance in impairment in several domains measured by the SF-36, including general health, social functioning, emotional role, and mental health, whereas a high level of severity of chronic medical illness explained the variance in impairment in physical functioning. Both high psychological distress and high severity of chronic medical illness explained the variance in impairment in vitality, and neither variable explained variance in impairment in physical role or bodily pain. CONCLUSIONS: In this rural outpatient primary care population, functional impairment was explained more by psychological distress than by severity of medical illness. Decreasing the burden of psychological distress among primary care patients may improve functioning.