The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1176/ps.44.6.583

Those who deliver mental health services to forensic patients should be aware that the revolving door exists on acute forensic units. Some of these units may view their near-exclusive mission as assessment of patients' competency to proceed through the judicial process. However, recognition that one-third of the patient population we studied were forensic unit recidivists and one-half of the population were severely psychiatrically disturbed suggests the need for more ambitious aims in forensic settings, including broaden psychosocial assessment, treatment, and linkage with continuing services.

Our data support the perception that the chronic mentally ill population is becoming entrenched in a fragmented system of treatment and incarceration. This state of affairs requires more skill by clinicians attempting to effect a semblance of continuity of care. Besides adopting a more comprehensive therapeutic approach on forensic units, workable legal remedies are needed to increase the chances that chronic mentally ill patients will receive adequate care. These remedies could include mandated jail and prison screening programs and case management systems, humane commitment laws, effective outpatient commitment statutes with postrelease monitoring, and conservatorship for gravely disabled persons (5-6,8,10).

Access content

To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.