0
Get Alert
Please Wait... Processing your request... Please Wait.
You must sign in to sign-up for alerts.

Please confirm that your email address is correct, so you can successfully receive this alert.

Articles   |    
Validating a Brief Version of the Mental Health Recovery Measure for Individuals With Schizophrenia
Nikki Panasci Armstrong, Ph.D.; Amy N. Cohen, Ph.D.; Gerhard Hellemann, Ph.D.; Christopher Reist, M.D.; Alexander S. Young, M.D., M.S.H.S.
Psychiatric Services 2014; doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201300215
View Author and Article Information

Dr. Armstrong is with the San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center (VAMC) (e-mail: nikki.armstrong@va.gov). At the time of this study, she was with the VAMC Los Angeles, California, where Dr. Young is affiliated. Dr. Cohen is with the VA Desert Pacific Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center (MIRECC) at the VAMC Los Angeles. Dr. Hellemann is with the Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, Semel Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, where Dr. Cohen and Dr. Young are also affiliated. Dr. Reist is with the VA Desert Pacific MIRECC at the Long Beach VA Healthcare Center, Long Beach, California, and the Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, University of California, Irvine.

Copyright © 2014 by the American Psychiatric Association

text A A A
PDF of the full text article.
Abstract

Objective  This study explored the psychometric properties of the 30-item Mental Health Recovery Measure (MHRM) and a brief, ten-item version of the scale (MHRM-10) in a large, multisite sample of individuals with schizophrenia.

Methods  The sample consisted of 795 veterans with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder diagnoses who were receiving mental health services in one of eight Veterans Health Administration medical centers across four regions of the United States. Exploratory factor analysis was used to examine the factor structure of the MHRM and to select the most appropriate ten items for the brief measure. Correlations of the MHRM and the MHRM-10 with measures of quality of life, satisfaction with mental health services, symptom severity, and functioning were computed to further establish construct validity. Cronbach’s alpha was used to assess the internal reliability of the MHRM and MHRM-10.

Results  Factor analysis resulted in an interpretable single-factor solution. The MHRM-10 was established by selecting the ten items with the highest factor loading scores. MHRM and MHRM-10 total scores correlated strongly and positively with quality-of-life measures (overall, leisure, general health, and daily activities) and negatively with depressive mood. Negligible correlations existed between the MHRM instruments and measures of functioning and satisfaction with services. Both instruments demonstrated excellent internal consistency.

Conclusions  This study provides initial support for use of the MHRM-10 as a brief, valid, and reliable assessment of perceived recovery among individuals with schizophrenia and one that may be easily used in routine care.

Abstract Teaser
Figures in this Article

Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.
Sign In Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.
Sign In to Access Full Content
 
Username
Password
Sign in via Athens (What is this?)
Athens is a service for single sign-on which enables access to all of an institution's subscriptions on- or off-site.
Not a subscriber?

Subscribe Now/Learn More

PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-5 library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources. This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development.

Need more help? PsychiatryOnline Customer Service may be reached by emailing PsychiatryOnline@psych.org or by calling 800-368-5777 (in the U.S.) or 703-907-7322 (outside the U.S.).

+

References

+
+

CME Activity

There is currently no quiz available for this resource. Please click here to go to the CME page to find another.
Submit a Comments
Please read the other comments before you post yours. Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest.
Comments are moderated and will appear on the site at the discertion of APA editorial staff.

* = Required Field
(if multiple authors, separate names by comma)
Example: John Doe



Related Content
Articles
Books
Manual of Clinical Psychopharmacology, 7th Edition > Chapter 1.  >
Manual of Clinical Psychopharmacology, 7th Edition > Chapter 2.  >
Manual of Clinical Psychopharmacology, 7th Edition > Chapter 9.  >
The American Psychiatric Publishing Textbook of Psychiatry, 5th Edition > Chapter 6.  >
The American Psychiatric Publishing Textbook of Psychiatry, 5th Edition > Chapter 10.  >
Topic Collections
Psychiatric News
Read more at Psychiatric News >>
APA Guidelines
PubMed Articles