0
Get Alert
Please Wait... Processing your request... Please Wait.
You must sign in to sign-up for alerts.

Please confirm that your email address is correct, so you can successfully receive this alert.

Articles   |    
The Recovery Group Project: Development of an Intervention Led Jointly by Peer and Professional Counselors
Carla A. Green, Ph.D., M.P.H.; Shannon L. Janoff, M.P.H.; Bobbi Jo H. Yarborough, Psy.D.; Robert I. Paulson, Ph.D.
Psychiatric Services 2013; doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201200546
View Author and Article Information

Dr. Green, Ms. Janoff, and Dr. Yarborough are with the Center for Health Research, Science Programs Division, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, 3800 N. Interstate Ave., Portland, OR 97227-1110 (e-mail: carla.a.green@kpchr.org). Dr. Paulson is professor emeritus at the Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, University of South Florida, Tampa.

Copyright © 2013 by the American Psychiatric Association

Abstract

Objective  The objective of this study was to develop and evaluate a low-cost, strengths-based group intervention led jointly by peer counselors and professional counselors to foster recovery among adults with serious mental illnesses.

Methods  Cohort 1 included development of materials and a feasibility pilot, with participants recruited from community mental health centers (CMHCs). Cohorts 2 and 3 included a small randomized controlled trial with participants recruited from members of a not-for-profit, integrated health plan. Cohorts 4 and 5 involved evaluation of the most appropriate length for the intervention with a pre-post design that allowed intervention length to vary between 12 and 18 sessions; participants and peer leaders were recruited from two CMHCs (N=82).

Results  Participants were very satisfied with the recovery-focused group intervention, preferred a greater number of weekly sessions (17 or 18 sessions), and reported improved outcomes across multiple domains.

Conclusions  Using peer-developed materials and a combination of peer and professional counselors as group leaders is feasible to offer and valuable to participants. Outcomes measures suggest that the intervention has potential to facilitate recovery in multiple domains.

Abstract Teaser
Figures in this Article

Topics

follow-up
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.
Sign In Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.
Sign In to Access Full Content
 
Username
Password
Sign in via Athens (What is this?)
Athens is a service for single sign-on which enables access to all of an institution's subscriptions on- or off-site.
Not a subscriber?

Subscribe Now/Learn More

PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-5 library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources. This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development.

Need more help? PsychiatryOnline Customer Service may be reached by emailing PsychiatryOnline@psych.org or by calling 800-368-5777 (in the U.S.) or 703-907-7322 (outside the U.S.).

Anchor for Jump
Table 1Sociodemographic characteristics of participants with serious mental illness in the recovery group projecta
Table Footer Note

a The question about age was inadvertently omitted from the questionnaire for cohort 1, although cohort 1 participants appeared to be of ages similar to those in the other cohorts. Mean±SD age was 44.2±9.8 for cohorts 2 and 3 and 47.2±11.9 for cohorts 4 and 5.

Table Footer Note

b SSI, Supplemental Security Income; SSDI, Social Security Disability Insurance

Anchor for Jump
Table 2Changes over time among recovery group participants, by cohort
Table Footer Note

a W-QLI, Wisconsin Quality of Life Index; RAS, Recovery Assessment Scale; BASIS, 24-item Behavior and Symptom Identification Scale

Table Footer Note

b There were no significant changes from baseline to follow-up 1 in the delayed-intervention control group.

Table Footer Note

c There were no significant changes from follow-up 1 to follow-up 2 in the intervention group.

+

References

del Vecchio P: SAMHSA’s Working Definition of Recovery Updated. Rockville, Md, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, March 23, 2012. Available at blog.samhsa.gov/2012/03/23/defintion-of-recovery-updated
 
Razzano  LA;  Jonikas  JA;  Goelitz  MA  et al:  The Recovery Education in the Academy Program: transforming academic curricula with the principles of recovery and self-determination.  Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal 34:130–136, 2010
[CrossRef] | [PubMed]
 
Corrigan  PW;  Angell  B;  Davidson  L  et al:  From adherence to self-determination: evolution of a treatment paradigm for people with serious mental illnesses.  Psychiatric Services 63:169–173, 2012
[CrossRef] | [PubMed]
 
Anthony  WA:  A recovery-oriented service system: setting some system level standards.  Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal 24:159–168, 2000
[CrossRef]
 
Gates  LB;  Akabas  SH:  Developing strategies to integrate peer providers into the staff of mental health agencies.  Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research 34:293–306, 2007
[CrossRef] | [PubMed]
 
Solomon  P:  Peer support/peer provided services: underlying processes, benefits, and critical ingredients.  Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal 27:392–401, 2004
[CrossRef] | [PubMed]
 
Doughty  C;  Tse  S:  Can consumer-led mental health services be equally effective? An integrative review of CLMH services in high-income countries.  Community Mental Health Journal 47:252–266, 2011
[CrossRef] | [PubMed]
 
 Consumer-Operated Services: The Evidence . HHS pub no SMA-11-4633.  Rockville, Md,  Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Center for Mental Health Services, 2011
 
Ridgway  PA;  McDiarmid  D;  Davidson  L  et al:  Pathways to Recovery: A Strengths Recovery Self-Help Workbook .  Lawrence,  University of Kansas School of Social Work, 2002
 
Campbell J, Leaver J: Report From NTAC’s National Experts Meeting on Emerging New Practices in Organized Peer Support. Alexandria, Va, National Association of State Mental Health Program Directors, National Technical Assistance Center for State Mental Health Planning, 2003
 
Davidson  L;  McDiarmid  D;  Higbee  JM:  Pathways to Recovery Group Facilitator’s Guide .  Lawrence,  University of Kansas School of Social Welfare, 2012
 
Knowles  MS:  The Adult Learner: A Neglected Species .  Houston,  Gulf Publishing, 1990
 
Knowles  MS:  Andragogy in Action: Applying Modern Principles of Adult Learning .  San Francisco,  Jossey-Bass, 1984
 
Schulz  KF;  Altman  DG;  Moher  D:  CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials.  Annals of Internal Medicine 152:726–732, 2010
[CrossRef] | [PubMed]
 
Friese  S:  User’s Manual for ATLAS.ti 6.0 .  Berlin,  ATLAS.ti Scientific Software Development GmbH, 2011
 
Conrad  KJ;  Yagelka  JR;  Matters  MD  et al:  Reliability and validity of a modified Colorado Symptom Index in a national homeless sample.  Mental Health Services Research 3:141–153, 2001
[CrossRef] | [PubMed]
 
Shern  DL;  Wilson  NZ;  Coen  AS  et al:  Client outcomes II: longitudinal client data from the Colorado Treatment Outcome Study.  Milbank Quarterly 72:123–148, 1994
[CrossRef] | [PubMed]
 
Becker  M:  A US experience: consumer responsive quality of life measurement.  Canadian Journal of Community Mental Health 17(suppl):41–58,1998
[PubMed]
 
Becker  M:  Quality-of-life instruments for severe chronic mental illness: implications for pharmacotherapy.  PharmacoEconomics 7:229–237, 1995
[CrossRef] | [PubMed]
 
Becker  M;  Diamond  R;  Sainfort  F:  A new patient focused index for measuring quality of life in persons with severe and persistent mental illness.  Quality of Life Research 2:239–251, 1993
[CrossRef] | [PubMed]
 
Corrigan  PW;  Giffort  D;  Rashid  F  et al:  Recovery as a psychological construct.  Community Mental Health Journal 35:231–239, 1999
[CrossRef] | [PubMed]
 
Corrigan  PW;  Salzer  M;  Ralph  RO  et al:  Examining the factor structure of the Recovery Assessment Scale.  Schizophrenia Bulletin 30:1035–1041, 2004
[CrossRef] | [PubMed]
 
Green  CA;  Perrin  NA;  Polen  MR  et al:  Development of the Patient Activation Measure for mental health.  Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research 37:327–333, 2010
[CrossRef] | [PubMed]
 
Eisen  SV;  Normand  SL;  Belanger  AJ  et al:  The Revised Behavior and Symptom Identification Scale (BASIS-R): reliability and validity.  Medical Care 42:1230–1241, 2004
[CrossRef] | [PubMed]
 
References Container
+
+

CME Activity

There is currently no quiz available for this resource. Please click here to go to the CME page to find another.
Submit a Comments
Please read the other comments before you post yours. Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest.
Comments are moderated and will appear on the site at the discertion of APA editorial staff.

* = Required Field
(if multiple authors, separate names by comma)
Example: John Doe



Related Content
Articles
Books
DSM-5™ Clinical Cases > Chapter 17.  >
DSM-5™ Clinical Cases > Chapter 19.  >
DSM-5™ Clinical Cases > Chapter 2.  >
DSM-5™ Clinical Cases > Chapter 2.  >
DSM-5™ Clinical Cases > Chapter 2.  >
Topic Collections
Psychiatric News
Read more at Psychiatric News >>
PubMed Articles