The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×

The case of Jared Lee Loughner, who killed or wounded 19 people in a shooting rampage in Tucson, demonstrates the confusion inherent in current rules for the treatment of defendants with mental illness. Found incompetent to stand trial and committed for treatment, Jared Loughner refused medication. However, when he became dangerous and suicidal, the facility treated him. Loughner's attorneys objected, arguing that the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Sell v. United States entitled him to a judicial hearing. The lack of clarity over the rules that should govern such cases stems from the court's failure to make explicit the rationale for its landmark decision. (Psychiatric Services 63:630–632, 2012; doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201200630)