Advanced Search

Brief Report | January 01, 2001

A Survey of Use of a Durable Power of Attorney to Admit Geropsychiatric Patients

David J. Rissmiller, D.O.; Erica Musser, D.O.; Walter Rhoades, D.O.; Frances R. Rissmiller, Ph.D.; Robert A. Steer, Ed.D.

Psychiatric Services 2001; doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.52.1.98

Article

Tables

text A A A

Abstract

Medical directors from 198 inpatient psychiatric facilities in 46 states completed a survey on the use of a durable power of attorney for health care to compel admission of unwilling patients with dementia. About half the facilities had a policy allowing use of a power of attorney for this purpose. Thirty-four percent believed that it was optional to use either a durable power of attorney or an involuntary commitment to force admission of demented patients, whereas 47 percent believed that such patients could be admitted against their will only through involuntary commitment.

Figures in this Article

Advance directives gained national attention with the implementation of the Patient Self-Determination Act of 1991 (1). The durable power of attorney for health care is an advance directive that allows a patient to retain a proxy for decision making when the patient experiences a loss of capacity (2). The durable power of attorney for health care has had limited use in psychiatric care (3,4). Its only use in geropsychiatry that has been studied is the practice of allowing a proxy to give written consent when incapacitated patients with Alzheimer's disease participate in research (5,6).

Recently we became aware that a number of psychiatrists use the durable power of attorney for health care to compel psychiatric admissions of unwilling geropsychiatric patients with dementia. Crumpacker (7) eschews such practice and considers it a violation of a patient's rights, which leaves the participating psychiatrist vulnerable to a lawsuit. To examine the frequency and conditions under which a durable power of attorney for health care is used for this purpose, the authors conducted a survey of hospitals nationwide.

Methods

Abstract | Methods | Results | Discussion and conclusions | Acknowledgments

Medical directors from 630 psychiatric facilities in 50 states were surveyed from August to October 1999. Only facilities in which geropsychiatric patients constituted at least 10 percent of the facility's total admissions were included in the survey. The survey described a geropsychiatric patient who was incapacitated by severe dementia and who refused needed psychiatric admission.

Survey questions included:

• Does the facility have an active policy for using a durable power of attorney for health care to admit such patients?

• Will the facility use a durable power of attorney for health care to admit such a patient if:

—the patient does meet commitment criteria?

—the patient does not meet commitment criteria?

• How frequently does the respondent currently use a durable power of attorney for health care when confronted with either of the above situations? (never, 0; rarely, 1; sometimes, 2; frequently, 3; or always, 4)

• Why doesn't the facility use involuntary commitment instead of a durable power of attorney for health care for such patients meeting commitment criteria?

• What are the respondent's beliefs about the legality of using a durable power of attorney for health care to force admission instead of involuntary commitment?

Results

Abstract | Methods | Results | Discussion and conclusions | Acknowledgments

Of 630 questionnaires mailed, 223 (35 percent) were returned from 46 states. Twenty-five (11 percent) returned responses were invalidated because the geriatric patient population at the respondent's facility was less than 10 percent of the total. The final sample included 198 respondents (31 percent of all mailings and 89 percent of returned responses). A total of 196 hospitals (99 percent) treated voluntary patients, and 165 (83 percent) treated involuntary patients. Sixty-eight hospitals (34 percent) had a dedicated geropsychiatric inpatient unit.

The respondents were almost evenly divided on whether their facility had an active policy for allowing use of a durable power of attorney for health care in coerced admissions. Ninety-four hospitals (47 percent) had such a policy, and 104 (53 percent) did not. Table 1 lists the frequencies with which the respondents' hospitals used a durable power of attorney for health care in coerced admissions.

As expected, facilities with existing policies used a durable power of attorney to compel admissions much more frequently than facilities without such policies. Such admissions were coerced whether or not patients met commitment criteria. At facilities with an existing policy, the mean±SD frequency rating for using a durable power of attorney to compel admission of patients who met criteria for involuntary admission was 1.88±1.29; the rating for this patient group was .36±.75 at facilities that did not have a policy (Welch's t=10.02, df=146, p<.001). At facilities with an existing policy, the mean±SD frequency rating for using a durable power of attorney to compel admission of patients who did not meet criteria was 1.64±1.36; the rating for this patient group at facilities that did not have a policy was .45±.88 (Welch's t=7.21, df=157, p<.001).

Whether or not a respondent's psychiatric facility provided voluntary, involuntary, or exclusively geropsychiatric services was not correlated with how frequently a durable power of attorney for health care was used. The point-biserial correlations were .09, -.10, and .09, respectively. None of these Pearson product-moment correlations was significant beyond the .05 level.

Ninety-nine respondents gave one or more reasons why the facility used a durable power of attorney for health care to compel admissions. Forty said that using a durable power of attorney allowed them to keep the patient hospitalized longer than commitment would allow. Twenty-nine said that involuntary commitments for such patients are hard to secure. Fifteen stated that their units were not allowed to accept involuntary inpatients. The remainder used this procedure for particular reasons that were specific to their facility or state.

More than a third of the 198 respondents (68 respondents, or 34 percent) believed that using a durable power of attorney for health care instead of commitment is a valid option. More than a third (74 respondents, or 37 percent) believed that it did not violate mental health laws to use this means to compel admission of a patient who is not committable. In contrast, nearly half (94 respondents, or 47 percent) stated that they believed that geropsychiatric patients with severe dementia can be admitted against their will only through use of involuntary commitment procedures.

Discussion and conclusions

Abstract | Methods | Results | Discussion and conclusions | Acknowledgments

This study showed that there are major differences in how psychiatric facilities use a durable power of attorney for health care for the coerced admission of incapacitated geropsychiatric patients. Roughly half of the 198 surveyed hospitals reported having a policy allowing the use of a durable power of attorney for health care for compelling admissions.

About a third of the respondents reported that they coerce admissions through use of a durable power of attorney for health care at least some of the time. Approximately 18 percent said they frequently or always used a durable power of attorney for health care for this purpose. They used this procedure whether or not the patient met criteria for commitment.

The medical directors who responded to our survey cited three reasons why using a durable power of attorney for health care for this purpose may be preferable to involuntary commitment. First, a durable power of attorney allows the psychiatrist to hospitalize a patient for as long as the proxy agrees, whereas involuntary commitment requires release once the commitment standard is no longer met. Second, involuntary commitment can be difficult to obtain for demented geropsychiatric patients. Finally, a hospital may not be able to accept involuntary patients.

Beliefs about the ethics and legality of using a durable power of attorney for health care in forcing admissions of such patients varied markedly among respondents. Thirty-four percent believed that it is optional to use either a durable power of attorney or an involuntary commitment to force admission of such patients, whereas 47 percent believed that such patients can be admitted against their will only through involuntary commitment.

Weaknesses in this study include a disproportional response rate among states. Although the number of surveys sent to each state was proportional to the number of psychiatric facilities listed in that state (8), the states did not all respond equally. Some states were overrepresented, inclu ding New York with 19 facilities (9 percent), Texas with 16 (8 percent), Pennsylvania with 15 (8 percent), North Carolina with 12 (6 percent), and Missouri with ten (5 percent). In four states, no facilities responded; in eight states, only one responded; and in eight states, only two. In addition, the study did not control for rural or urban location or facility size.

Some respondents reported that their state had laws specifically forbidding the use of a durable power of attorney for health care to admit psychiatric patients. Because three of the states in which respondents reported such laws also had the highest response rates (New York, Pennsylvania, and Texas), the actual use of a durable power of attorney for health care to compel psychiatric admission may be greater than reported in this study.

Despite these limitations, the results underscore the inconsistency with which a durable power of attorney for health care is being used in the United States to coerce admission of incapacitated geropsychiatric patients. The implications are important. If it is proper to force geropsychiatric patients into treatment with a durable power of attorney, then facilities that do not allow this practice are leaving many patients without needed inpatient treatment. Conversely, if it is unethical or illegal to use a power of attorney to forcibly admit patients, then significant numbers of geropsychiatric patients' rights are being violated.

Acknowledgments

Abstract | Methods | Results | Discussion and conclusions | Acknowledgments

The authors thank Beth Reichman for funding the purchase of the American Hospital Association list of psychiatric inpatient facilities in the United States.

Dr. David Rissmiller is vice-chair of the department of psychiatry and associate clinical professor of psychiatry, Dr. Musser and Dr. Rhoades are residents in psychiatry, and Dr. Steer is professor of psychiatry in the School of Osteopathic Medicine at the University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey (UMDNJ-SOM) in Cherry Hill. Dr. Frances Rissmiller is in private practice in Haddonfield, New Jersey. Send correspondence to Dr. David Rissmiller at UMDNJ-SOM, Suite 100, 2250 Chapel Avenue, Cherry Hill, New Jersey 08002-2000 (e-mail, rissmidj@umdnj.edu).

Table 1. Frequency with which 198 inpatient psychiatric facilities reported using a durable power of attorney for health care to compel admission of unwilling patients incapacitated with dementia

View Large | Download Slide(.ppt)
Add to My POL

Table 1. Frequency with which 198 inpatient psychiatric facilities reported using a durable power of attorney for health care to compel admission of unwilling patients incapacitated with dementia

View Large | Download Slide(.ppt)
Add to My POL

CME Activity

There is currently no quiz available for this resource. Please click here to go to the CME page to find another.

Submit a Comments

Please read the other comments before you post yours. Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest.
Comments are moderated and will appear on the site at the discertion of JBJS editorial staff.

* = Required Field

Comment Author(s)*(if multiple authors, separate names by comma)

Example: John Doe

Affiliation & Institution*

Comment Title*

Comment*

Cancel

Print
PDF
E-mail

Recipient(s) will receive an email with a link (good for 72 hours) to 'A Survey of Use of a Durable Power of Attorney to Admit Geropsychiatric Patients' and do not need to have Psychiatric Services account to access the content.
Your Name:*
Example: John Doe

Email Address:* CC Me:
Enter your valid email address. Example: jdoe@example.com

Recipient's Email Address:*
Separate multiple email address with semi-colons (up to 5).

Subject:* 's Psychiatric Services: 'A Survey of Use of a Durable Power of Attorney to Admit Geropsychiatric Patients'
Subject for your email.

Message:
(Optional, message will truncate at 1000 characters)

Processing your request... Please Wait...

Copyright © in the material you requested is held by The American Psychiatric Association (unless otherwise noted). This email ability is provided as a courtesy, and by using it you agree that you are requesting the material solely for personal, non-commercial use, and that it is subject to The American Psychiatric Association's Terms of Use. The information provided in order to email this topic will not be used to send unsolicited email, nor will it be furnished to third parties. Please refer to The American Psychiatric Association's Privacy Policy for further information.

Copyright © American Psychiatric Association. All rights reserved.
Share
Get Citation

David J. Rissmiller, Erica Musser, Walter Rhoades, Frances R. Rissmiller, Robert A. Steer; A Survey of Use of a Durable Power of Attorney to Admit Geropsychiatric Patients. Psychiatric Services. 2001 Jan;52(1):98-100.

Download citation file:

RIS (Zotero)

EndNote

BibTex

Medlars

ProCite

RefWorks

Reference Manager

Copyright © American Psychiatric Association. All rights reserved.
Reprints